The Nike Air Max 2017, like many popular athletic shoes, has garnered both praise and criticism from consumers. While lauded by some for its comfort and style, others have reported significant issues, leading to a surge in online complaints and discussions regarding durability and longevity. This article delves into the nature of these complaints, analyzes potential causes, and offers advice to prospective buyers considering purchasing a pair of Nike Air Max 2017s, either new or used.
Understanding the "Klacht" (Complaint): A Breakdown of Common Issues
The term "klacht," often seen in online forums and discussions related to the Nike Air Max 2017, translates from Dutch to "complaint." The complaints surrounding this particular model revolve primarily around premature wear and tear, specifically:
* Cracking and crumbling of the midsole: This is perhaps the most prevalent complaint. Users report the Air Max 2017's midsole, the foam cushioning layer, cracking and crumbling after relatively short periods of use. This isn't necessarily limited to heavy use; some users report issues even with moderate wear. The cracking often starts subtly, with small fissures appearing before eventually leading to significant structural damage and potentially compromising the shoe's support and comfort. The age of the shoe seems to be a significant factor; older pairs are more prone to this issue.
* Air unit issues: While less frequently reported than midsole issues, some users have experienced problems with the visible Air Max unit. This can manifest as a loss of air pressure, leading to a less cushioned and responsive feel, or even a complete deflation of the Air unit. This significantly impacts the shoe's intended performance and comfort.
* Upper material degradation: While less common than midsole issues, some users have reported problems with the upper material of the Air Max 2017. This can include tearing, separation of stitching, or general wear and tear that exceeds what would be expected for the shoe's price point and intended use.
* Sole separation: In some cases, users have reported the outsole separating from the midsole, rendering the shoe unusable. This is a serious structural failure and highlights potential manufacturing defects or material weaknesses.
Analyzing the Causes: Material Quality and Usage
Several factors might contribute to the reported issues with the Nike Air Max 2017:
* Material degradation over time: The materials used in the construction of the shoe, particularly the midsole foam, are susceptible to degradation over time, especially with exposure to elements like heat, moisture, and UV radiation. This is a natural process, but the reported premature cracking suggests that the materials may not be as durable as expected for a shoe of this price range.
* Manufacturing inconsistencies: Manufacturing inconsistencies can lead to variations in material quality and construction, resulting in some shoes being more prone to failure than others. This could explain the disparity in experiences reported by users, with some experiencing no issues while others encounter significant problems.
* Usage patterns: While the shoe is designed for athletic activities, the intensity and frequency of use can significantly impact its longevity. Heavy use, particularly on abrasive surfaces, can accelerate wear and tear, potentially leading to the reported issues. However, many complaints highlight issues even with moderate use, suggesting a potential underlying material flaw.
* Storage conditions: Improper storage can also contribute to material degradation. Exposing the shoes to extreme temperatures, direct sunlight, or excessive moisture can accelerate the breakdown of the materials.
current url：https://qwoeat.h824a.com/all/nike-air-max-2017-klacht-98178